Hi Cagney,
No that is not what I am saying. I am saying when cash back is given (as stated in the casino’s rules; use the coupons of one promo 5 times and can’t win, you get a cash back).
It also comes up when a bonus does not go in automatically and a manager has to credit it manually.
There are manager credits that are given at the manager’s discretion, but no more then $100. And the managers know what they are doing; they give this to players that show obvious signs of someone who is 99% not going to cash out, due to his game play.
And if he had lost the $100 manager credit, plus a $100 deposit, then the net profit would be $200 and $100 would be taken of since it was a manager credit. The other $100 would come up as “Net Profit” which is the part of the stats you should be looking at.
You can accuse us of untimely payouts, I can’t deny. You can accuse us of untimely answers to emails, which I can’t deny. You can accuse us of having “nasty” terms, or whatever you want to call it, I can’t deny. But we are honest with keeping to our terms; I want this accusation dealt with.
The accusation has been made that when more manager credits are applied then deposits made, it “dissolves the commissions”, right? That is the accusation.
So my response is that in the Professor’s stats for January, February, March and April, THE SAME amounts of credits were applied, yet he made money. If the theory being posted is correct, no money could have been made during these months. If the stats are posted, my point will be made.
These past stats are 100% relevant and you can prove me wrong or right easily, so please post them. No intention on being mean or disrespectful, but I want to clear things with everyone.
Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
GamblingWages Affiliate Manager