I don’t think that’s quite correct. When the law was created stating that it was no longer illegal for the vagrant/rogue to steal from the butcher, then that would equate to the world stating it’s OK for Antigua to steal intellectual property from US companies.
The butcher did nothing to the rogue to cause him to resort to a life of thievery. The rogue simply doesn’t have the skill or capacity to be a butcher, in the same way that Antigua does not have the skill or capacity to produce marketable items such as a Microsoft. Antigua/rogue is a one-trick pony whose economy is founded on licensing gaming operations, not butchery.
In what way has any intellectual property owner made “free trade” less available to Antigua? Antigua’s battle is against the US policy makers and not intellectual property owners who happen to be registered in the US. It would be unfortunate for both the integrity of Antigua and the wealth of intellectual property owners if Antigua should sink to such a level. I’m not saying it wouldn’t be “allowed” in a legal sense; I only saying that it would be clearly unethical.