To simplify it even further…
A person (Antigua) may exist in a society where he is incapable of “earning a living” based on a variety of external forces (US Gov) beyond his control. That person may in turn feel he has no choice but to steal from the butcher (US company), and everyone who understands the vagrant’s predicament could hardly fault him for the thievery. The underlying truth of the matter is that it is still thievery, and while it may seem justified in light of the situation, the butcher who makes an “honest living” would likely think otherwise. There is no justice in such an arrangement even if a law is passed saying it’s OK to steal from the butcher. The butcher did not create the social environment and yet must now suffer as a result.