I am not all that interested in duscussing Gambling 911, and I think Carlos is not either.
What I am concerned about is, that the indictment states that BETUS has been charged, and yet, they do not seem to admit that, via:
While BetUS was named as one of the clients working with that processor they were NOT indicted. The charges are leveled at the payment processor not their clients or customers who used the service
The information you have Professor is false, and that’s more concerning…
GPWA has posted the actual indictment here: http://www.gpwa.net/news/US_v_Lombardo.pdf