bud405n wrote:
You guys just dont get it.
I get it.
Polosi is a huge threat, but probably won’t get her personal agenda perpetuated unless we need a tie-breaker… even then at that, the House is just 50% of the process. You know that it’s more complex than just her beliefs.
Also, even if she’s 100% for the ban, is online gambling one of her platforms? She may have strong feelings about it, but decide to focus on other issues.
I will be happy to cover this on a webcast… do you still have the letter/email?
Thanks…