Nick, every professional blackjack player every mathematician who has ever looked at blackjack is in 100% complete unanimous agreement that the proper play of 10,10 vs. 6 is Stand, regardless of the number of hands played, and therefore that your opinion that the proper play is Split, is wrong.
Since you are making the fantastically bold claim that you have outsmarted every professional blackjack player and every mathematician on the face of the planet, you are expected to provide some evidence to back up your position. This could take the form of any of the following:
1. Corroboration from a professional blackjack player or a mathematician that believes your version is correct. (That is, evidence that I’m wrong when I say that the entire professional community disagrees with you.)
2. The results of a computer simulation, whose source code is public, that shows a higher EV from splitting vs. standing.
3. Actually testing your strategy vs. the traditional strategy, where each side wagers on the outcome. I have challenged you repeatedly to put your money where your mouth is on this one, by each of us dealing hands to the other.
Yet you won’t do any of these things. What evidence do you provide that you’ve outsmarted the entire professional community? None. And no, repeatedly posting faulty equations in a web forum doesn’t constitute evidence. Evidence is showing us that someone with any credibility actually agrees with you, or that a computer simulation agrees with you, or that your strategy can survive a real-world test.
Why should anyone believe you when you not only offer no evidence, but you actually refuse to do so?
Repeating this mistake a 100 times doesn’t make it true. We keep telling you that this DOES factor in resplits and 2-handed play. You can keep ignoring this, but that doesn’t make it true. If you believe otherwise, then start providing some evidence for your position.