I get what you’re saying, you’re saying that i will lose more, of course i will, if i use your ridiculous numbers, that nobody can dispute
that 0.3 is actually 0.33 on brands that dont carry the name wizard, but none of that really matters
again, you play dumb pretty good, and i know you’re doing it on purpose
just for the record, the numbers are 0.66(0.33 x 2)when splitting
you just said they are 0.3(0.3 x 2)=0.6, but for 10 pages here you were saying they were 0.56, i guess the odds changed again, at least they changed in my favour this time
you are just too much guy
even with the slight in expected return the overall probability of resplits and playing those extra hands is what returns more in the long run, which is what i said on page 1
your 0.70 number is also in question, its 0.667 on non wizard brands, i guess unlike you, they don’t count a tie as a partial win, which is what you did
your formula is weak and inacurate, as you keep proving
just keep going
aside from that, lets use your numbers and pretend they are correct for a minute
0.47 by splitting
i’m assuming we’re splitting to 6 hands ?
that means im betting 3 x as much per standing hand
(6 x 100 ) vs (2 x 100)
0.47 x 6= 2.82 = win $282 for each $600 bet=$47 for each $100 bet
0.70 x 2 = 1.4 = win $140 for each $200 bet=$70
so by placing one bet(one hand) of $600 with a 10 vs a dealer with a 6, i will win $282, but i’m a 65% favourite, i should win $390 on average with this hand
how do you figure
go check your numbers again