November 20, 2006 at 10:53 pm
#716340
Inactive
I’m with Dom on that one. I can see why negative carry-over is used, and I don’t have a problem with it personally – it’s more important that the casino is reputable IMO. But like Dom, I would tend to de-prioritise a neg carry-over property when I’m down – it’s just a sensible business move to send a player where I can earn from them.
The $3k per week cashout rule aside (which is not an issue for most low-rollers anyway), I’ve liked what I’ve seen so far.