Simmo! wrote:
While I agree that one player in 6 months is not unreasonable, personally, if I’m going to send a player to a casino under a “rev share” option and that player continues to make money for them beyond 6 months, even if I’m retired and living in Outer Mongolia, I would still want to be compensated while that player continues to provide an income.
Conversely, if the terms clearly state “1 player every 6 months to continue receiving payments”, as here, then it’s not deceptive. Just not appealing.
Cheers
Simmo!
Yep. And there are programs where this is not an issue.