Reply To: Aftermath of the HR vote

I thinkn that you’re wrong here – and that has been borne out by several other gamblnig companies following suit with the same retrospective restriction on US players.
sleepy.gif

ummmmm… I am not a legal expert or anything but if they were actually frightened of a POSSIBLE law that MIGHT get passed in a country that does not have jurisdiction over them (which would all be silly business decisions) then uhhhhh… why are they going to let EXISTING u.s. players continue to play???…. seems to me that they borne out the truth in their own Email.
Really I don’t see the logic in saying that they are being up front as to their reasons because another company wanted to bail on u.s. players. I really don’t think it has anything to do with any POSSIBLE u.s. law that has not even been passed.