Bonusgeek wrote:
Can anyone that doesn’t talk like a professor at Yale interpret that last post from Ganchrow for me.Well I did say it was an academic point — consider it a digression into the underlying economics of the considerably less than aptly named “True 35% Wager” plan.
The important point is that despite RA’s protestations to the contrary, the wager share plan will be much worse for most affiliates than would rev share.