I see alot of webmasters who lack ethical practices. Ethics is very ambiguous, the way we ought to behave as individuals. Morality is how we should behave, closely related but also seperate.
As webmasters promoting Gambling programs, I feel its our moral obligation to check out the program we are promoting. But its quite clear, some webmasters lack any moral character. Its tough serving two masters money and morality. Most choose money, and money has no intrinsic value just instrumental and the two don’t often work together.
The conflict is clearly demonstrated here on CAP. Cap has the tough decision of serving two masters. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn’t. For example, why is 888.com still certified?
Contrary to my findings and others its a clash of moral values where money takes presidence. I find the whole arguement very hypocritical, promote good programs put your players first but the affiliate program itself lacks moral character. What do you do put the player first? I say yes.
I have researched 888.com to the hilt, even played there lots. They just didn’t meet the standards I set for my site.
So, the people supporting roque casinos lack the moral character and do it for the wrong reasons. Sending players to a roque is bullshit so is promoting roque affilaite programs such as 888.com. Honesty is the best policy its the path to the Good Life. greek39