This is due to the fact that the first purchase made at a casino is heavily incentivised (for example they Purchase $50 and Get 200 credits Free) and therefore leaves the casino with a negative revenue. A player who makes a purchase without needing to be incentivised is a valuable player for both you, the affiliate, and the casino.
The above means that you will be earning commission on players who are actually spending money and not hunting for free bonuses. In addition, you will earn commission on your customer across all casino brands within Belle Rock Gaming at which they play.
This is nonsense. Increasing numbers of players do not accept bonuses. The wagering requirements have become such a nuisance that increasingly I hear from players who want to know if a casino places the bonus automatically or if they ask you to apply for it. They prefer the casino NOT put a bonus in their account. I never use bonuses either. So now you get punished for bringing in players who are in it just for fun and entertainment. If the problem is incentivised play, I would rather pay a piece of the incentive and enoy the definite non-bonus hunting players I bring in. This argument is totally flawed.
Addressing the “Lapsed Customer” clause
This is not a retro-active change. We know that if a Customer has not purchased nor played for an extended period of 6 consecutive months, there is no chance that they will return to the casino. On the positive side, should you manage to re-active this customer, you will earn commission as per the Casino Commission Model that you are on.
This IS a retroactive clause. It is being applied to players we brought in previously. If it were to apply only to players brought in after August 1, then it would not be retroactive. Flawed logic again.
And again, I am proof of the opposite. I return every other year or so, but return I do, and I do drop money when I return.
And the seller/buyer clause means in effect that you control who we can and cannot sell to. Some of us have built up a piece of online real estate exactly with the thought of selling to retire.
And now you will decide who we will be able to sell to? I think not!
And going down to 20% RETROACTIVELY if we choose a new payment method – if you have a number of existing players you are a fool to switch!