Afterthought:
Thinking about this in my sleep last night, it occurred to me that the most major issue is the quality of sites participating. Obviously we dont want scrapers or banner farms in here, and site sthat are little more than lists of copied reviews and bonuses should probably be discouraged. However, volume of sites is quite important to maximise the benefit. Probably want 100 or more sites at least to make it a worthwhile piece of technology.
I’d appreciate thoughts on this too:
Some ideas for this to bat around:
1) A manual inclusion check
2) Sites from people who are active on CAP/GPWA forums
3) A minimum PR level for inclusion
4) A manual (and hidden) extra ranking based on quality and PR
5) Some sort of nomination for inclusion system
Feel free to add your thoughts on one or more of the above – or other ideas.
Simmo!