Originally posted by bluebook
I never understood this argument. So your arguing abortion is murder and bush wants to save these infants but at the same time he’s killing people on death row? So the argument here is hes allowing some people to live but at the same time hes murdering others?How can one even argue this? Surly one can’t compare a death row inmate to a baby!
But what I really don’t understand is, if you make a statement like this than how can you vote, or fight for a candidate who is pro-abortion? You’ve just admitted that abortion is murder. Very few arguments can be made why one would vote against somebody who is pro-life.
Maybe somebody can better explain to me what I’m missing in bigkahunas argument?
First of all, I have not said anything about abortion being murder, but I believe that is what those who are againts abortions are argumenting. The point I’m trying to make is that if you are againts killing innocent infants (i.e. against abortion), how can you believe that captial punishment is any better, when it has been proved that there are lots of innocent people who have been killed and are currently sitting on death row?
I agree to what Amateur is stating, in the end, you cannot force anyone to give birth to a child, this is what many countries belive is a human right to decide over.