Hi,
those that have history reaching back to the days of gpwa’s prime; will know that I am certainly no fan of amateur and frankly won’t be surprised if all that is said is proven to be true.
That said; I agree that proof should have went hand in hand with the publishing of names, or before, and not the other way around.
To address Jim’s post about us having for lack of better words, an internal affairs, there is not external to police.
This is not a company, a corporation, and certainly not a an entity created by, and put into place to perform any kind of acts on behalf of its public.
So to have an internal affairs would only open doors for what would be inevitably the same ending for CAP as happened at gpwa. Too few would be put in power to decide the fate of too many, and all with in the end; their own agendas to think of and likely act accordingly.
I do however appreciate Jim’s ambition to see justice done.
well I am not a GPWA “reject” as amateur said; which in itself was extremely incorrect because the majority of people here that came here from gpwa, are ones that left willingly as I did: in my case to avoid reading aggresive and IMHO unproductive posts by such people as amateur.
In fact she was about 80% the reason I left gpwa and am sad to see anything concerning her brought up here. IMHO she’d jump on any chance to argue and has probably had wet panties ever since she saw a chance to come here and stir up trouble.
Now however, we must see this thru.
I think it comes down however to the fact that cpa deals DO invite rip-offs and I’m certain turn the head of all those who have few ethics or morals.
Do the simple math and the answer hits you over the head with an anvil. Would you send quality players to some place for only a couple hundred bucks a piece?
Whatever rocket scientist it was that came up with the cpa deal was in fact not a rocket scientist at all, but rather much like the very kind of people that are being discussed today.
They didn’t want to pay the lifetime residuals and knew there would inevitably be a few out there that due to either lack of fluid resources, or due to the inability to see the forest for the trees in front of them: would take the ready money waived in front of their face as opposed to waiting for the real money to roll in.
No offense personally Simon, but I found your statement that most affiliate programs want to be fair as good a laugh as I’ve had for some time.
Translation is: most aff programs want to APPEAR to be fair. Even the ones that started out with good intention to be a fair deal for all involved, soon found themselves promising more than they could deliver in order to compete with unscrupulous programs which promised the moon, and easily could do that; because they were shaving the hell out of affs anyway. But in order to survive, the good programs had to start finding creative ways to stay afloat yet not take away from all that had already been promised.
And that is the case when it comes to CPAs. The problem was however they got more unscrupulous webmasters that were taking more money than was being saved by offering this deal in the first place because most of the money-making webmasters didn’t swing for the cpa pitch. The rip-offs however lined up for a nice juicy all you could eat buffet.
I will not be sorry to see amateur and her aggressive, non-productive ways to leave this place and its “rejects” to why we came here in the first place; to move on in life and spend our time towards a common goal of being successful in this niche: and not to spend our time bickering and acting like this was 4th grade again.
live long and prosper amateur; but do it some place else.