I think we’re all in agreement about the candidates and that voting is unlikely to turn events around.
That being said, the reason I think voting is imporant here is that a good turnout indicates that people are beginning to wake up and take notice. U.S.A. has a notoriously low voter turn-out.
A good turnout with real or spoiled ballots would show the same cognition.
I lived in the U.S. for some time – in Oklahoma when the trade centers were attacked – and the contrast between political awareness between down there and up here in Canada is stark. There is no comparison. I seldom ran into anyone who knew what was going on, or even gave a rats ass! (I don’t mean they didn’t agree with me – I hadn’t formed much of an opinion at all back then – I mean people really didn’t think about politics much).
The general ignorance as well as some dogmatic attitudes and patriotism “issues” are what is making all this NWO scheme glide smoothly and unemcumbered into the future.
So, IMO, if there is a good voter turn out, it’s a sign that U.S. citizens are sloughing off their “patriotic” fog and seeing things as they actually are, not as they are told they are.
Since it’s very unlikely that Ralph Nader is going to win the next election, the only thing that is going to stop the Illuminati, IMHO, are huge grassroot movements.
*******
P.S.
I think that Kerry is less dangerous than Bush, regardless of his associations and platform, simply because (I don’t think) he isn’t ensconsed with Bush Sr. cronies, Rumfeld et al. If Bush is re-elected there won’t be a hope in hell of taming the beast.
This is why I hate to think that people will cast spoiled ballots – the kind of people who would do that are liberals, not republicans. A spoiled ballot = a vote for Bush.