Now there you go, Spear. You are making more sense.
I think that particular group of people over there has a place in the industry.
It is kind of like the connection between a lot of different elements. It is an important group because of exactly who all showed up.
Cap is a great place for casino affiliates – I have always been an active part of CAP since I entered the industry. I would not do that if I didn’t think Cap was useful and interesting and supportive and a whole slew of other good things.
As far as the casino affiliate business – CAP is and will remain the place to be.
The goup over there transcends this and is something much broader. It is an entirely different thing alltogether, just as jtodd’s place is something entirely different and they do not infringe on each other at all.
Jtodd provides an analytical service for affiliates – that is totally different from Cap which is an interactive place.
The Oak group does not fit in any real mold – it is a group of people who are active in the business, know each other and between them have a lot of pull. Just how to use that pull is the issue.
I would think that this group could be highly effective in supporting various efforts or resolving issues. I don’t want to see it go to waste.
Maybe it should think of itself as more of an informal and exclusive group – a think tank. Not a place that likes to expand and grow into something but a dynamic problem solving place.
Lol, I think I should be posting all that over there.