- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 5, 2009 at 4:06 pm #615314EvelinessaMember
3.8. In the event that a special deal has been negotiated with you, it is your responsibility to honour your side of this agreement. If you fail to honour your side of the agreement or you remove our brands from your site, or change the position agreed. then the deal is considered broken and all deals – CPA and revenue share – will be immediately reduced to the lowest parameters advertised on this site. This reduction in percentages will be back-dated to the start of our partnership with you.
February 6, 2009 at 4:02 pm #794676Purely BingoMemberThanks for the info ArJun, but it is still unclear if you do meet the target in terms of minimum purchases without new players, is it in effect?
February 6, 2009 at 9:28 pm #794711StephanieRoseMemberHey Guys,
The recent changes to our terms are not designed in any way to negatively affect loyal affiliates that we have established a long relationship with. We understand that our partners at times may have difficulty sending players and this revision was not designed to punish these affiliates. It was designed to stop abuse by affiliates on revenue share who initially refer a group of players and then stop sending players for many many months after that. There is no intention by them to establish a long term relationship which is beneficial to the both us. We therefore reserve the right to reduce their commission to the basic level offered by us . We will of course continue paying this commission but these affiliates will no longer enjoy any preferential rates that come from working together in a close and constructive partnership.
If anything in our T&C’s is unclear or you wish to discuss this further please feel free to contact me directly either by sending me pm or emailing me at pauline@egamingonline.com
Thanks,
Pauline
Affiliate Manager
EGO
http://www.egamingonline.comFebruary 7, 2009 at 3:24 pm #794749neophyteMembersounds reasonable imo. thanks for clarification.
is there no scope for retaining the preferential rev share on players acquired while preferential rev share deal was set up, with standard rev share for those acquired during “down months” ?
not sure if anyone actually does this, but it doesn’t sound too unreasonable imo.
-
AuthorPosts