- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
@Professor 156919 wrote:
Revenue Share ALWAYS produces more.
Would you think so for poker too? I`m wondering which option has been more profitable for members that promote poker rooms.
cheers
imho, unless you are running a good sized poker forum and/or have updated literature on poker strategy and the likes, you are better off with CPA as most players will just lose money and not play much afterwards…
for casinos, you are much better off with revenue share in the long run. your potential earnings could be 10x if not 100x bigger than CPA…
In my opinion, it depends on the market you are targeting.
In some markets you won’t see many players spending top dollar on casinos and poker. In those cases, CPA could be better for you.
But if the idea is building long term relations with the casino and poker rooms, nothing beats Revenue Share. In the long term, you could be able to offer better promotions and negotiate terms with AMs.
One good idea would be using split trackers and testing the waters.
Rev Share of course. It’s strange but I have never had any players there:sarcasm: I think it’s time to remove them.
the more common the casino the less likly you will see conversion since “everyone” knows about them and “they” are everywere to be found…
