- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 22, 2007 at 2:33 am #603445triplecrownMember
I was wondering if anyone had any experience in cloaking the affiliate link with JS. I know how to do it, but doe it increase your CTR?
Anyone?
June 22, 2007 at 6:11 am #740391AnonymousInactivewhen it comes to stopping players from signing up without going through your linking code.. no it doesnt.
it gets used for other purposes.. but they arent very nice ones..
June 22, 2007 at 6:49 am #740395triplecrownMember@kar 128598 wrote:
…it gets used for other purposes.. but they arent very nice ones..
Kar, I don’t quite get you. Are you saying that JS cloaking of your affiliate link could be used maliciously? If so how?
June 22, 2007 at 7:42 am #740396AnonymousInactivei dont think that it will increase the clickthrough rate BUT it is much easier to change links and actually calculate the clickthroughs on your end when cloaking aff. links…
June 22, 2007 at 8:29 am #740408AnonymousInactivewagerx.. apologies,didnt say it correctly.
It isnt malicious, but sneaky when some affiliates do link exhanges with other affiliates. Some affiliates will do link exchanges using this javascript method.
What this does is make sure that the bots dont follow through the links…As for a user clicking on the javascript link, thats fine, nothing malicious there. Although I prefer to use this an alternate method, rather then having straight normal links to the advertised casino, an alternative is using php, where your link could look like
http://www.wagerx-website.com/linkto.php?gotocasino=casinoid
further.. if the user did copy and paste that link into their browser.. it would still send them to the casino.. with your affiliate id attached!
June 22, 2007 at 9:08 am #740410triplecrownMember@kar 128617 wrote:
wagerx.. apologies,didnt say it correctly.
It isnt malicious, but sneaky when some affiliates do link exhanges with other affiliates. Some affiliates will do link exchanges using this javascript method.
What this does is make sure that the bots dont follow through the links…o, I got you now! I totally agree that “link exchanges” are cloaked via JS or exclusions in Robot.txt files.. or orphaned It’s not ethical, and a complete waste of time. One great thing about this forum is that you can find great link partners who keep the links up like they should. Most likely because there’s accountability. lol.
Thanks for the clarification kar!
Cheers!June 22, 2007 at 12:19 pm #740418vladcizsolMemberSome people make links to their casino html redirects with no follow so that they dont bleed PR out…. :wink-wink
June 22, 2007 at 12:20 pm #740420AnonymousInactiveNofollowing links doesn’t prevent PR from bleeding out. The site you’re linking to doesn’t receive any PR, but that doesn’t mean that the amount of PR that’s sent to the other links on the page isn’t still divided by the total number of links on the page.
@Professor 128629 wrote:
Some people make links to their casino html redirects with no follow so that they dont bleed PR out…. :wink-wink
June 22, 2007 at 12:29 pm #740423AnonymousInactive@Randy 128631 wrote:
Nofollowing links doesn’t prevent PR from bleeding out. The site you’re linking to doesn’t receive any PR, but that doesn’t mean that the amount of PR that’s sent to the other links on the page isn’t still divided by the total number of links on the page.
You also have to consider what google thinks of a site that’s full of no follow links.
June 22, 2007 at 4:52 pm #740457AnonymousInactiveGoogle doesn’t care if all your links are nofollow or not. The important thing to remember is that Google does actually “follow” the links, they just don’t pass PR to the landing site.
As for the cloaking question, there really is no difference in click-thru rates IMO. The link a user is clicking on can look clean as in http://www.casinosite.com, but have the affiliate code behind it. The user is going to click on it anyway, and many of the affiliate codes redirect to a clean URL anyway, so to the user it is a seamless process. I wouldn’t assume that most surfers pay attention to the URL anyway, or care what it is, there are tons of dynamically driven sites out there today that have all sorts of crazy looking URLs, people don’t stop using them.
If you do cloak the links in Javascript, Google definitely won’t see the link and you won’t leak PR that way, though I’m not sure that’s much of an issue anyway. It would be interesting to test out however.
June 22, 2007 at 5:14 pm #740460AnonymousInactiveI just use
//Hide status bar msg II script- by javascriptkit.com
//Visit JavaScript Kit (http://javascriptkit.com) for script
//Credit must stay intact for usefunction hidestatus(){
window.status=''
return true
}if (document.layers)
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEOVER | Event.MOUSEOUT)document.onmouseover=hidestatus
document.onmouseout=hidestatus
before the end of the HEAD tag.
I just hide all links with no links. dont know if that will reduce CTR though.. hoping not.
June 22, 2007 at 11:32 pm #740494AnonymousInactiveI am currently making a small application that will let me track the clicks on each link and will also create an outgoing link for each affiliate link. I will let you know how it works.
June 23, 2007 at 1:46 am #740499AnonymousInactiveI just use the redirect code
and to the visitor it looks like mysite.com/casinos/slotland.htm
that way if I need to change the code I just update the slotland.htm file. I’m sure the JS stuff you can do that too but this has worked great for meJune 23, 2007 at 2:01 pm #740538AnonymousInactiveA very simple script:
Make a file called 123casino.php
and in it place:
header("location: http://www.afflink.com"); ?>
Solid solution, much better than a meta refresh too.
June 23, 2007 at 2:24 pm #740541AnonymousInactiveA very simple script:
Make a file called 123casino.php
and in it place:
header("location: http://www.afflink.com"); ?>
Solid solution, much better than a meta refresh too.
That does work better that the refresh. Thanks!!!:thumbsup:
-
AuthorPosts