- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
About what?
Market Junction wrote:About what?It’s a civil liberties issue and the judge hates invasion of privacy by the gov.
I was just trying to get you to expand why you think the new legislation violates civil rights and the constitution. I hate it as much as the next person, but it’s well within the rights of the legislative branch to do what they did and it doesn’t infringe on any personal constitutional issues.
Professor wrote:I am emailing Judge Wapner and Judge Judy too, just for good measure…:laughing: If you don’t mind I think I’ll cover Judge Joe Brown, Judge Mathis, and heck might as well send an email to Judge Hatchett and Judge Larry Joe while I’m at it. :rollover:
And on a more serious note; as a word of caution do not mess around with judges; if you erp them the wrong way they will do you in.
As far as I am concerned telling me what I can and cannot do in my own place, with my own money which I already paid taxes on, is a civil liberties issue.
Holding speeches in the house about how people gamble in their bathrobes – geez!
Nobody’s business. I work in my bathrobe a lot – is that going to be illegal too? How about buying stocks on the internet while wearing a bathrobe?
Perhaps soon we will have to wear a tux to read the newspaper on sunday morning in our livingrooms.
Dominique wrote:As far as I am concerned telling me what I can and cannot do in my own place, with my own money which I already paid taxes on, is a civil liberties issue.Holding speeches in the house about how people gamble in their bathrobes – geez!
Nobody’s business. I work in my bathrobe a lot – is that going to be illegal too? How about buying stocks on the internet while wearing a bathrobe?
Perhaps soon we will have to wear a tux to read the newspaper on sunday morning in our livingrooms.
While I agree with you, feelings and the law are two different things.
Where do your civil liberties come from?
Well it won’t hurt to ask the judge. I’m going to email him next time he’s on Fox and Friends usually at 6am US eastern time.
Dominique wrote:As far as I am concerned telling me what I can and cannot do in my own place, with my own money which I already paid taxes on, is a civil liberties issue.So you should be able to cook up some meth in your own home? Should you be able to operate a brothel out of your own home? How about perform dental surgery in your own bathroom?
You are free to do what ever you want so long as it does not conflict with any existing laws; but the second you start breaking laws it doesn’t matter if you are using your own money in your own home.
I might not fully agree with it; and certainly do have opinions on victimless type offeneses; but my opinions as does yours means squat when it comes to big brothers opinion. They are doing what they do to protect the masses not individuals so civil liberties isnt a good defense in most cases.
Market Junction wrote:While I agree with you, feelings and the law are two different things.Where do your civil liberties come from?
You tell me.
They don’t exist.
Dominique wrote:You tell me.They don’t exist.
Well, if they don’t exist then there’s no point in going further with the conversation.
axl wrote:So you should be able to cook up some meth in your own home? Should you be able to operate a brothel out of your own home? How about perform dental surgery in your own bathroom?Maybe. The real question is whether people are capable of managing those things on their own, whether consentual and free rating systems will spring up, common sense could prevail, like communities would separate themselves, or whether everyone needs a leviathan to decide for them.
re: civil liberties…
Quote:They don’t exist.They only exist to the point where people are willing to fight for them. In modern times, this means you need a modern army. It isn’t enough to have people, swords, pitchforks, etc. There is no longer a force by simply having a majority, or even a large majority. 5% of the people in a sample country could wipe out the other 95% in their own country. So, who controls everything? Those that have the loyalty of the ultra-armed 5%. Shut up. Be happy.
Oneguy2nv wrote:5% of the people in a sample country could wipe out the other 95% in their own country. So, who controls everything? Those that have the loyalty of the ultra-armed 5%. Shut up. Be happy.O.T. for sure, but that sounds a lot like N. Korea. I just hope that punk ass leader isnt like Heavens Gate “Do” or Jim Jones; if he has a death wish all his followers will walk behind him into the abyss and we will all get drawn into it to some extent.
im guilty, lock me up and throw the key away.
is there anything i dont do in robes?Dominique wrote:I work in my bathrobe a lot – is that going to be illegal too? How about buying stocks on the internet while wearing a bathrobe?
