- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 12, 2006 at 12:23 am #711317
Anonymous
InactiveFirepay left the US market because their parent company has considerable US interests.
NETeller has no US ties and we have spoken directly with them. They have no plans to leave the US market.
October 12, 2006 at 1:02 am #711330Anonymous
InactiveGet MoneyBookers.com on board.
UK registered and licensed – and specifically created for Gambling Accounts originally – they’ve branched into other areas now.
More popular in European markets I guess – but a very useful e-wallet.
:Nod:October 12, 2006 at 1:04 am #711331Anonymous
InactiveI understand click2pay will be around.
October 12, 2006 at 1:12 am #711333Anonymous
InactivePayspark, anyone heard news?
October 12, 2006 at 1:58 am #711336Anonymous
InactiveTheGooner wrote:Get MoneyBookers.com on board.UK registered and licensed – and specifically created for Gambling Accounts originally – they’ve branched into other areas now.
More popular in European markets I guess – but a very useful e-wallet.
:Nod:The fact that it’s UK registered will make moneybookers.com quite vulnerable just like it worked for 888.com, and other gambling sites.
What if moneybookers.com won’t accept US players and neteller too? We don’t know who is going to pull the plug until the law is signed. Maybe Neteller is not saying this not to hurt its balance because too many people will close their accounts and withdraw their funds for the “fear of unknown”?
No one can say for sure anything at the moment, but it would be good to understand the implications of these common gambling deposit mechanisms closing down operations to US based customers.
Maybe neteller should open an independent division for gambling???
October 12, 2006 at 2:23 am #711338Anonymous
InactiveIt is all a waiting game from now on. With enough pressure, I can see Neteller bailing and every other payment processor bailing. With Bush & Co. in power, anything is possible.
October 12, 2006 at 10:40 am #711365Anonymous
Inactivesplinterfree wrote:The fact that it’s UK registered will make moneybookers.com quite vulnerable just like it worked for 888.com, and other gambling sites.You’re confusing being a UK registered company – with being a publicly registered company.
Moneybookers.com are designed with merchants payments for gambling in mind – it’s where they came from- so there is no “dirt” to worry about or shareholder sentiment.
October 12, 2006 at 11:28 am #711367Anonymous
Inactiveyes, that’s the point all over the gambling issue. Public vs. Private. What we will see is most public companies opening private companies offshore. This way they can accept US players without anything to worry about. So, US players will have less protection thanks to Frist and his team.
October 12, 2006 at 12:05 pm #711371Anonymous
InactivePayspark, anyone heard news?
PaySpark is now offering eCheck as a funding option.
So you can deposit via eCheck or wire and withdraw via a debit card from Lebanon.October 12, 2006 at 3:40 pm #711396Anonymous
InactiveI contacted Payspark earlier this week and they said they were still reviewing it, they have to make a statement soon I would think.
Brian
-
AuthorPosts