- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
That code is for Google Analytics, which used to be Urchin. There is nothing to worry about with that code, it is just relaying weblog stats to Google. The main thing you want to look for, if you have the time, is meta code using the “nofollow” attribute. That tells search engines not to follow the link on a page, and essentially cancels the vote being cast by a site for that link. I’m not all that familiar with the tag, but I’m guessing you can use it in individual hrefs as well. Would be a good tag however if you wanted to point out a rogue casino or something, but didn’t want them to get credit for a link.
The site in which my link was added is a PR 7 in the index.
The pages of the directory are quite old, so there is not reason for the non index.This webmaster is tricking hundreds of partners.
I will take the time to read the whole code, since I want to post the complain in the industry forum.
Just listen to Webber, he knows what hes talking about.
THere is no trick. The page code looks fine.
You said that you are 1 of 100’s of links?
Why do you expect Google to catalog it?TheGooner wrote:THere is no trick. The page code looks fine.You said that you are 1 of 100’s of links?
Why do you expect Google to catalog it?Mistake.
The website is a PR 7 and maybe they are 300/400 partners in the whole directory.
Something like 30 links per page.
All in perfect order to be indexed. For some reason no one page is in the results.
And there are old pages.
There is something in the html to avoid the spider and I’m not talking of non index robots.If you are receiving a bad link, why waste the time worrying about it? Just remove the reciprocal link and move on.
Yes.
No way to deal with a rogue.Anyway it was a good lesson.
In the future one of the firt tasks will be to check if the partner page is fully indexed.
I detected at least 9 cases like the above.
And all from “well established sites”.I don’t know wich technique there are using.
Is something more sophisticated than robots.
