- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I changed over but would not do it for all programs if it was offered.
If you have the wham bam thank you sir type players, then I say no. The kind that just join because of the no deposit offers and might put $25 in themselves.
But for loyal customers that just plain like the site and re deposits all the time, now those are patient players and players that can easily wager 30K with just a $50 deposit and break even. By breaking even you made no rev share, but by having the wagering share, you made I believe roughly 300 to 400 dollars based on 30K wagered.
I would definately use it if Gambling Wages had it. I can’t count all the times I was making close to 2K in one month, and the last day without fail, a winner, and no commission.
It’s also good to see what games your players are playing
Dana
I changed over, also, and love the new stats.
It makes me a lot happier to know that my earning aren’t based on people losing their shirts by clicking thru from my site.
I made money from the switchover but, since we’re on 45% for this month, would need to wait to see if it is financially beneficial in the long run – although I’m optimistic about that.
QUOTE
If you have the wham bam thank you sir type players, then I say no. The kind that just join because of the no deposit offers and might put $25 in themselves.
UNQUOTEThis is a fairly serious consideration and a point that needed to be raised. Most players make a deposit, play a bit, lose, and leave – no money there.
Win some, lose some. I was very surprised to learn that I have a player from last October who has stayed with me to run up a very healthy amount of play. It sure is nice to know your players.
ntaus
Thanks for your feedbacks. I’ve actually have players who have been depositing for a few years and are playing considerably each week. I will wait for a few more comments and then make my final decision.
That type player will pay a lot better under the new system.
It’s the bonus hunters or one-spin wonders that won’t pay well. But then they never really pay well, especally when they win. Which at least will not matter here.
looks like a catch 22 now. I switched over and although my commissions dropped by 2/3’s, I think it will work out in the long run – BUT – having 47 sub-affiliates and apparantly some of them did not change over because their players are winning. When there is a significant neg balance by sub affiliates, then their players must be winning alot and now my commissions have dropped even more because of it.
I wish I could detach the sub affiliates whether their players are winning or losing until we are both on the wagering share.
Dana
Hi Dana/All,
I don’t usually post outside our forum, but Renee brought this to my attention. On issues like this subaffiliate bug, it would be appreciated if you can email me or post in the RewardsAffiliates.com forum so I can address it quickly.
Sub affiliates are for your _benefit_ only. So, you will not have those earnings count against your personal earnings. If they are, then it’s simply an issue with the new system which I need to fix.
To that end, please email me and provide your aff id or username … I’ll fix it.
