- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 12, 2006 at 3:30 am #686014
Anonymous
Inactivewith no requirements?
Sure I’d take that over revshare on certain programs, add it to your portfolio mixed in with rev share programs.
March 12, 2006 at 4:33 am #686016Anonymous
InactiveNope not me, the only way I know that I get what each depositor is worth is taking the revshare plan..
March 12, 2006 at 9:52 am #686026Anonymous
InactiveBet22 wrote:A lot of people in the forum say that Rev share is the best since in the long term you always make more..I just got offered a U$350 CPA deal…
Would you do it for that price?
Thanks
It depends. I’d think it was fine for 80% of my users … in fact I’d think that the casino/poker room were probably over paying. Assuming a 35% rev share (before deducts) it probably means that each customer would have to drop $1,200 there to balance up.
But … would YOU still feel happy if …
1) You didn’t get paid for it because the client says “the volumes were not big enough” after a month ?
or
2) You found out that some big whales went there ?
or
3) They are a fly-by-night that are going to rip off your customers (and you).
Basically $350 cpa is a lot to pay to acquire – and I’d be checking out the longevity of the casino/poker room – especially if you’ve not worked together before.March 12, 2006 at 2:31 pm #686037Anonymous
InactiveI would definitely take it. I am not targeting high stake players specifically so it would be a great deal to me.
March 12, 2006 at 5:05 pm #686042Anonymous
InactiveI would for sure say “no way”. If they are that desperate ask for a new labtop or something, maybe paid inclusion, or even cash up front. CPA deals are crap, greek39
March 12, 2006 at 5:23 pm #686043Anonymous
InactiveAre your players going to make more than $350 each for the poker room?
If you take the profit from like 10 players and average, is it more than that?
If it is less the room will soon dump you and possibly tell the others that you accept deals you know you cannot live up to and no one will do deals with you again.
CPA can even out variance for you. If you bring enough top players to make up for the room’s expense, they will swallow a month of bad players and pay you in full anyway. But you have to deliver more than they pay overall in order for them to continue.
So in effect you sell your right to any whales and large players for a more consistent income.
If you do not produce the whales you are out and your reputation is damaged. If you do produce the whales you likely are losing money.
Occasionally this works out to a proper average and you just get more even payments.
March 13, 2006 at 10:14 pm #686152Anonymous
InactiveVery seldom will a CPA deal ever equal your average player value; and if it’s worth more you lose, if it’s worth less you lose.
It should also be obvious that the higher the CPA deal the tougher it will be on you to produce! Shady programs know this, they will offer to give you $500 CPA and when you produce 100 players worth $200 each they will refuse to pay you saying you have sent fraudulent players. Lets reemphasize that; the second your referrals are not producing an amount greater than the CPA your account will likely be tagged fraudulent, closed and you wont be paid a dime for any of that months referrals.
If you are looking for quick cash, then do flat fee advertising, charge programs an upfront listing fee for a months worth of exposure. You might even choose to tell them the minimum buy is 3 months. Gett the ball in your court and dont let them hold all the strings!
BTW, if I might ask, who has offered you this CPA?
-
AuthorPosts