- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Just another scamming affiliate.
Heh, from someone who knows the rakeback landscape, trust me, ThisistheNuts is not a scam affiliate.
They’re one of the top rakeback sites. If Party allows rakeback like the 2+2’ers are hoping, sites like Nuts will blow past practically every affiliate here in terms of gross revenue within a month.
Going to be interesting to see how this plays out.
Exactly, that site is one of the big rakeback sites. They aren’t under the table at all. Further, they say this is with permission of Party, so that makes this even more interesting. Let’s be clear, this isn’t an isolated indicent. Rather, this suggests a very negative trend, and one that is being supported by the major player in online poker.
PartyPoker.com does not support Rake Back
Bevess wrote:PartyPoker.com does not support Rake BackSo, you’re saying the email I posted above isn’t true? I understand that you stated your opposition, but are you enforcing it? This is also worse than regular rakeback since it goes to the core of potential problems: users getting new accounts in order to receive rakeback.
If you have an existing Party Poker account that has not been dormant, you should ideally create the new account (after you receive your sign-up code) using a different email address and Neteller account
This is an obvious attempt to fly below the radar, and to me a sign that there is no agreement woth PP.
I wish thisisthenuts would come over and post about this.
Dominique wrote:This is an obvious attempt to fly below the radar, and to me a sign that there is no agreement woth PP.I wish thisisthenuts would come over and post about this.
I don’t think Aleksandrs Pavulans has the nuts, er, guts to discuss and debate this. Should players be rewarded: Yes! Should we play a shell game of rakeback with existing players? No! Simple microeconomic principles should be able to establish a rake discount structure for frequent players — this would just be a further extension of existing in house incentives to players. I understand the market that’s driving this, but the answer isn’t affiliate driven rakeback.
rocketfly wrote:Simple microeconomic principles should be able to establish a rake discount structure for frequent players — this would just be a further extension of existing in house incentives to players. I understand the market that’s driving this, but the answer isn’t affiliate driven rakeback.That’s it in the nuts -emm- the nut shell.
