- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Hi there,
On 28 May 2009, Jeff G. was playing at Vegas Sky Casino when he won the 1 Million Reels BC progressive jackpot of $248,138.65.
Jeff had newly joined and was playing the 1 Million Reels BC progressive slot with a no deposit bonus he had received from the casino, when lady luck smiled on him.
Exactly how Jeff plans on spending his winnings is yet to be determined, but we have it on good authority that he is on cloud nine right now.
To ensure complete clarity – Vegas Sky Casino will be paying Jeff the full progressive amount won, even though it was won on a no deposit offer.
Here is your chance to benefit from Jeff’s big win. Vegas Sky Casino is offering all players, new and existing, a 100% Match bonus, up to $200, to play on the 1 Million Reels BC Progressive slot.
We have created new banners for this slot, showing Jeff’s big win, and the new promotion specific to this progressive game. This is a limited time offer…so don’t delay – grab these banners now as they are sure to increase player acquisition.
Warmest Regards,
Kamiel MahomedAffiliate Manager
kamiel@vegasskyaffiliates.com
http://www.vegasskyaffiliates.comHi Kamiel
Rival seems to be creating tremendous confusion amongst affiliates or at least with me.
How could this customer be paid out for a progressive jackpot when he was playing a no deposit bonus?
A few weeks ago another Rival casino did not pay out the progressive jackpot due the fact the the customer was using a “free chip” which, in my eyes at least, is the same as a no deposit bonus.
WTF :exclamati
Hi Ixian,
I think that the main point to remember is that each casino is a seperate operation, not run by Rival. Although all Rival casinos use the same software provider, each casino sets its own terms on promotions, and as such, handle resulting wins from these promotions differently.
The “free chip” offer, used by Jeff G. who won the progressive jackpot at Vegas Sky Casino, did not have a maximum withdrawal limitation to it, nor were progressive slots exempt from the allowed games he could play on. Hence, the progressive win was regarded as valid.
If I understand correctly, the other casino in question denied the progressive win based on that they had a maximum allowed withdrawal in place on the promotion, and hence the player not being paid. Where Rival has come into the picture is that the decision was made on their side to re-allocate the denied progressive win back to the slot machine.
I hope this clarifies this issue. If you have any other questions, please feel free to let me know.
Kind regards,
Kamiel MahomedAffiliate Manager
http://www.vegasskyaffiliates.com
