- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
Damn, bettors (squares and wiseguys) were all over the COLTS, PATRIOTS, SAINTS and BEARS.
Damn, that HURT big time!
OUCH!
Hi,
I’ve always done my best in the playoffs as things are condensed and its unlikely any game is fixed.
I would suggest to get used to getting beaten up during the playoffs.
just an opinion. maybe I’m wrong.
You don’t think the Eagles and Saints game was fixed with the officials making all the calls once Philly was in the lead against Philly?
bleuze wrote:You don’t think the Eagles and Saints game was fixed with the officials making all the calls once Philly was in the lead against Philly?You read my mind ?
How do you think i felt after watching my 300-1 futures bet on Philly go up in smoke
http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/bb/nfl-playoffs-week-2.17616.html?
Post #5 from that thread, #11 too
In the Sea/Chi game towards the end where nobody looked like they wanted to score, if only you could have seen the aerial view of the field, and see what the QB saw, total fix, taking sacks instead of getting easy 1st downs.
Even coach Holmgren’s comments were suspicious after the game, “hopefully they’ll let us get one more shot at it with this team”…wtf does that mean exactly
The fact that the 4 NFC teams went 4-0 at home as the favourites, but 0-4 ATS is peculiar enough.
This is big time money season now, and i noticed that the majority of outcomes could not have been more favourable for the books…example…
Sea/Dal, Sea -2.5 points was the line, most Seattle punters would lay the -2.5 since 3 points is usually the minimum margin of victory in this game. Dallas punters would take Dallas at +140(think it was)on the money line to win straight up, logically very few people who thought Dallas had a shot would bet them ATS, they would only bet the ML or nothing, very few would bet Dallas to lose by 2 points or less if they thought they had a shot.
Yet somehow, quite miraculously, that’s exactly what happened, Seattle won by 1 point, and both sides got the screw job, Seattle backers = 0, Dallas backers = 0, bookies = 100
If that line happened to be 1 point off, Sea -3.5 points, it would have changed things dramatically, then you would have gotten more action on Dallas and less on Seattle, ATS, of course with that example the action will always shift from one side to another when the line is adjusted, i’m just talking about the volume of action in a game like this.
This is a little thing involving small lines
In the Phi/NO game, the line was NO -5.5, i bought the adjusted line NO -3.5 in addition to Philly straight up on the ML, for that very reason, the chance of them losing by 3 points, i did the same in the Chi/Sea game.
I do this if i like a team that is a big dog
If the line is small like the above game, 3 points or less, i can’t do this, in my mind that Sea/Dal game was a pickem and i bet on nobody, but if i did bet it, i would either bet Sea-2.5 or Dal +140, both bets would have lost, and i can assure you that most gamblers bet one of those two outcomes, as a result, most gamblers lost money on this game…anyone who bet just Dallas +2.5 is really a loser, even though they would win on this occassion, that is not sound gambling.
And don’t think the books and the NFL don’t know that, i can guarantee you they count their money, and the totals are finalized by the end of the 1st quarter.
You just have to be careful, i’m watching that Chi/NO line, it went from Chi -1 to Chi -2.5, could be a copycat Sea/Dal game
I think i made sense
